President Donald Trump has fired Shira Perlmutter, the Register of Copyrights and head of the U.S. Copyright Office. The dismissal occurred shortly after the office released a report on the use of copyrighted material in training artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
Perlmutter was terminated by an email from the White House. This decision follows scrutiny over copyright laws related to AI development.
Details of the Dismissal
Shira Perlmutter had led the Copyright Office since 2020. The report focused on how copyrighted works are used to train AI models.
It stressed that copyright protection applies only to works showing human creativity. Machine-generated content, it noted, should not receive similar protection.
This report raised concerns about AI systems potentially infringing on creators’ rights. AI-generated content may compete unfairly with human-made works.
The White House fired Perlmutter soon after the report’s publication. This followed the dismissal of Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden.
Representative Joe Morelle criticized the firing as an “unprecedented power grab with no legal basis.” He linked it to Perlmutter resisting Elon Musk’s AI training efforts.
Significance and Broader Context
The firing highlights tensions between fast AI advances and existing copyright laws. The Copyright Office questioned expanding copyrights to AI-generated content.
Representative Adam Schiff introduced the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act in 2024. This bill would require AI developers to disclose copyrighted works used in AI training.
Alongside the legal debate, AI firms face lawsuits alleging copyright infringement. OpenAI advocates for clear government rules allowing fair use in AI training.
Elon Musk supports radical copyright reform, backing calls to “delete all IP law” alongside Jack Dorsey.
Sequence of Events Leading to the Firing
The Copyright Office published a comprehensive report on AI and copyright law. It questioned whether “fair use” covers training AI on copyrighted works.
The report allowed that research might be fair use. It warned commercial use of copyrighted content for AI likely exceeds fair use boundaries.
The office suggested government intervention is premature but supports licensing markets for AI companies to pay creatives.
After the report, Perlmutter was informed via email about her immediate removal. This was part of a wider shake-up in cultural agencies.
These developments reflect ongoing debates about balancing AI innovation with protecting intellectual property rights. The discourse will likely continue as AI advances.
The Copyright Office’s AI report is available as a pre-publication document. It provides nuanced guidance on AI training and fair use.
The dismissal followed the earlier firing of Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden, showing broad administrative changes in cultural institutions as described by CBS News.
Leave a Reply